I wonder if you may be mixing up the usability of the UI with the look of the UI. When I say "I hate Curve's UI" I am talking about functionality problems. When I say "I love Curve's UI" I am talking about the aesthetic.
Curve needs to fix their UI. They don't need to change the way it looks (the design language) very much, if at all.
Could be -- I know that launching highly efficient smart contracts is top of importance for Curve, second is making the website functional to interact with them, a distant third is design.
When users talk about retro style, that's definitely comments on design, and this seems to be of some importance to users.
I wonder if you may be mixing up the usability of the UI with the look of the UI. When I say "I hate Curve's UI" I am talking about functionality problems. When I say "I love Curve's UI" I am talking about the aesthetic.
Curve needs to fix their UI. They don't need to change the way it looks (the design language) very much, if at all.
Could be -- I know that launching highly efficient smart contracts is top of importance for Curve, second is making the website functional to interact with them, a distant third is design.
When users talk about retro style, that's definitely comments on design, and this seems to be of some importance to users.